Post by Andreas F. GeissbuehlerOriginal Message johnmbouma
Post by johnmboumaI am currently in a college class where we use cobol,
370 assembler and jcl on a system9 ibm mainframe.
I set up a herc/turnkey environment ...
I second Jo on this and URGE YOU to continue with herc
and MVS 3.8j, even Assembler 370, but forget COBOL.
I do not agree. I started working in 1974 when MVS 3.8j was current.
The TK3 system is basically the same environment we had in production
back then, The only real difference is we were using JES3 rather than
JES2.
IBM Cobol is forward compatable, meaning many of the old programs will
still compile and run with little or no change. The COBOL compiler
included with TK3 is outdated with regards to the modern COBOL language
extensions but as a learning tool, it is a very good starting point. I
used to teach a COBOL programming class and TK3 was more than adequate.
Post by Andreas F. GeissbuehlerYou need to master current, modern COBOL which you can
accomplish short-term by visiting Prof. Don Higgin's website
at www.z390.org. Don's Java-based zASM and zCOBOL at
www.zcobol.org are modern, state-of-the-art implementation
which I recomend you should evaluate and consider to use,
instead of, in addition to and/or in combination with TK3.
Above I wrote "short-term"...
Anyone, where have IBM's brilliant marketing gurus of yesterday
gone? Why is a student, the next generation mainfame specialists
scrootching around in an attic for anything useful to learn COBOL?
In many cases, the business world does not seem to care about the future
of mainframes. My company is laying off the mainframers and hiring
"kids" with PC skills but no mainframe skills. Many American
universities have stop teaching mainframe topics.
Post by Andreas F. GeissbuehlerWhy can't he download a "zLCD" personal-use licensed z/OS 1.4
with all tools needed for learning mainframe programming?
Andreas F. Geissbuehler
AFG Consultants Inc.
http://www.afgc-inc.com/